Metacognition Training — The Science Behind 'Thinking Soccer' and How to Develop It Through Journaling

Photo by Christian Agbede on Unsplash

Metacognition is a concept introduced in 1976 by developmental psychologist John Flavell, defined as "thinking about thinking." It consists of two components:

1. Metacognitive knowledge — Knowledge about your own strengths, weaknesses, and thinking patterns. For example: "I tend to lose peripheral vision under pressure" or "My positioning on crosses from the left side needs work."
2. Metacognitive regulation — The ability to adjust your actions based on that knowledge. For example: "I noticed my vision narrowing, so I'll drop the ball back and reset."

In soccer terms, a player with strong metacognition is someone who can recognize how they are thinking in real time and adjust their play accordingly. When a player with low metacognition makes a bad pass, they chalk it up to bad luck. A player with high metacognition runs through a different process: "I was rushing → my vision narrowed → I missed the open teammate on the far side → next time I'll look up before deciding." This loop runs almost automatically.

Photo by Laurenz Kleinheider on Unsplash

MacIntyre et al. (2014) — Metacognition Is "Curiously Under-Explored" in Sport

MacIntyre, Igou, Campbell, Moran, & Matthews (2014) published "Metacognition and action: a new pathway to understanding social and cognitive aspects of expertise in sport" in Frontiers in Psychology. The central argument of the paper is that despite decades of metacognition research in educational psychology, the concept remains "curiously under-explored" in the context of sport.

MacIntyre and colleagues argued that metacognition is a critical factor in explaining individual differences in sports performance. In particular, they proposed that differences in metacognitive skill may largely account for why athletes with the same level of physical ability perform differently. This offers a scientific answer to the perennial question in soccer: "They all do the same training — so why do some players improve faster than others?"

Toner & Moran (2014) — Expert Athletes Benefit from Conscious Awareness

Toner & Moran (2014) published "In praise of conscious awareness: a new framework for the investigation of 'continuous improvement' in expert athletes" in Frontiers in Psychology. Traditional sports psychology held that expert-level movements are performed unconsciously, but Toner & Moran challenged this view.

Their argument is straightforward: expert athletes actually benefit from conscious awareness of their own movements. Even skills that have been automated can be continuously improved through metacognitive monitoring. This directly contradicts the misconception that once a player is 'finished,' reflection becomes unnecessary. Science shows the opposite — ongoing metacognitive awareness is what enables continuous improvement at the highest level.

Brick, MacIntyre & Campbell (2015) — Metacognitive Self-Regulation in Elite Athletes

Brick, MacIntyre, & Campbell (2015) published "Metacognitive processes in the self-regulation of performance in elite endurance runners" in Psychology of Sport and Exercise. This qualitative study examined international-level Irish endurance runners to map in detail the metacognitive processes they employ during competition.

The findings revealed that elite athletes use a combination of the following metacognitive strategies:

• Planning — Preparing multiple strategic scenarios before competition based on anticipated conditions
• Monitoring — Continuously checking their physical state, pace, and mental condition during competition
• Evaluation — Making real-time judgments such as "Is my current strategy working?"
• Regulation — Consciously adjusting focus of attention or pace based on ongoing evaluation

This process maps directly onto soccer. Tactical planning before a match (Planning) → Checking your own positioning and passing accuracy during the match (Monitoring) → Asking "Is my defensive approach working?" (Evaluation) → Adjusting your position or style of play (Regulation). The ability to run this four-stage cycle at high speed is the essence of what people call "soccer IQ."

Esposito et al. (2025) — Metacognitive Strategies Are Effective in Coaching Too

Esposito, Ceruso, Cavalera, Cozzolino, & D'Elia (2025) published "Metacognitive strategies improve self-regulation skills in expert sports coaches" in Scientific Reports. The study tested the effects of a metacognitive strategy training program with 71 expert sports coaches.

The results showed that coaches who received metacognitive strategy training demonstrated significantly improved self-regulation skills compared to the control group. This study carries two major implications. First, it provides direct evidence that metacognition can be improved through training. Second, it suggests that when coaches develop stronger metacognitive abilities, the quality of their instruction to players may also improve.

Mechanism 1: Forced Activation of Self-Monitoring

The moment you sit down to write "what happened in today's match," your brain automatically begins reviewing your own actions during the game. This is the metacognitive process of monitoring in action. The self-monitoring ability that Brick et al. (2015) identified in elite athletes can be developed through the habit of regular journaling.

The crucial point is that writing raises the resolution of your monitoring. Instead of a vague feeling of "today was bad," you arrive at specific observations like "In the 15th minute of the first half, I panicked under the press during build-up play and chose a long ball that was intercepted." This increase in resolution directly improves your decision-making accuracy in the next match.

Mechanism 2: Structuring Causal Attribution

Writing about "why that play happened" engages the metacognitive process of evaluation. Research by Cleary & Zimmerman (2001) showed that expert athletes, compared to non-experts, tend to attribute outcomes to specific technical factors rather than vague causes.

Attributing a mistake to "lack of talent" blocks growth. Attributing it to "my body was facing straight ahead on my first touch instead of being open" leads to a concrete action for improvement. Writing in a journal transforms the attribution process from intuitive and vague into structured and specific.

Mechanism 3: Pre-Programming Future Actions

Writing "next match, I will do this" is advance preparation for the metacognitive process of regulation. The elite runners in Brick et al. (2015) prepared multiple scenarios before their races. Writing in a soccer journal something like "If the opponent presses high next match, I'll play it back to the keeper instead of forcing the build-up" is exactly this kind of strategic preparation.

Andrea Pirlo — "Controlling the Tempo of a Match Inside His Mind"

In his autobiography 'Penso quindi gioco' (I Think Therefore I Play), Pirlo described his in-match thought processes in remarkable detail. The title itself is a play on Descartes' 'I think, therefore I am,' revealing that Pirlo understood his own playing style as fundamentally an act of thinking. Pirlo's greatest strength was his ability to consciously control the tempo of a match — an outstanding form of metacognitive regulation. He constantly monitored whether the pace should be faster or slower, then manipulated the rhythm of the entire game through the speed and timing of his passes.

Xavi Hernández — "Reading the Match Four Seconds Ahead"

Xavi repeatedly stated in interviews that he would scan his surroundings three times before receiving the ball. This is a textbook example of deliberate information gathering — metacognitive monitoring. Furthermore, Xavi explained: "I'm not deciding what the best play is. I'm gathering the information I need to decide what the best play is." This layered structure — consciously controlling the process of gathering information for decision-making — is metacognition in its essence. Xavi's celebrated ability to 'read the game' was a sophisticated integration of metacognitive knowledge (pattern recognition of situations) and metacognitive regulation (automated information-gathering routines).

Andrés Iniesta — "Structured Thinking Behind Seemingly Intuitive Play"

Iniesta's play appears 'intuitive' at first glance, but as Toner & Moran (2014) argued, expert 'intuition' is not unconscious automation — it is the product of highly metacognitive processes. Iniesta himself described in his autobiography how he simultaneously processed the opponent's center of gravity, his teammates' movement patterns, and shifts in available space while instantaneously evaluating which play would be most effective. This is the monitoring → evaluation → regulation cycle identified by Brick et al. (2015), accelerated to its absolute limit.

What all these players share is the fact that they reached the very top not through physical ability, but through metacognitive ability. None of them — Pirlo, Xavi, or Iniesta — were exceptional in terms of speed or physicality. What set them apart was their ability to consciously control their own thinking processes — an extraordinary level of metacognition.

Exercise 1: The "Decision Fork" Log

After a match, write down three 'decision forks' — moments where you chose option A over option B. For each one, record: (1) why you made that decision, (2) what alternative options existed, and (3) what the outcome was. This exercise trains metacognitive monitoring and evaluation simultaneously.

Exercise 2: The "Emotion Log"

Record the emotional shifts you experienced during the match in chronological order. For example: '10 min — fully focused,' '30 min — frustrated after conceding,' '60 min — tired and losing concentration.' This is a practice in monitoring your own internal state. As MacIntyre et al. (2014) noted, awareness of your emotional state is a crucial dimension of metacognition. By making the link between emotions and decisions visible, you can discover patterns such as 'I tend to attempt risky passes when I'm frustrated.'

Exercise 3: The "Outside Observer" Perspective

Describe your own play in the third person. For example: 'He panicked under the press in the 65th minute and chose the safe back-pass. If he had taken two seconds to scan the field, he would have spotted the overlapping run on the right side.' By depicting yourself as an external observer, you practice what Toner & Moran (2014) call conscious awareness — an effective technique for developing a metacognitive perspective.

Exercise 4: The "Pre-Match Scenario" Prep

Before a match, write three 'if-then' scenarios. This is the soccer adaptation of the strategic pre-planning that Brick et al. (2015) found in elite runners. For example: 'If the opponent plays a high line → look for long balls in behind,' 'If their press is fast → use the goalkeeper in build-up,' 'If I make a mistake and get down on myself → take 30 seconds of deep breathing, then refocus on the next play.' After the match, review whether these scenarios actually played out and how well they worked. This feedback loop progressively sharpens your metacognitive regulation.

Exercise 5: The "Weekly Pattern Analysis"

At the end of each week, review all your journal entries and extract recurring patterns. Observations like 'I've lost concentration in the second half three matches in a row' or 'I always pass in the same direction when pressed' are invisible from a single entry. Toering et al. (2009) showed that the quality of reflection matters — and quality means not just isolated reviews, but recognizing long-term patterns. Building metacognitive knowledge requires this kind of meta-level reflection.